The Burnt Orange Radio podcast is up and running. We've published twenty episodes so far and they can be found on iTunes and Podbean (search: Burnt Orange Radio). We are currently recording two episodes a week which are typically published on Tuesdays and Fridays. We hope you enjoy the show and encourage you to participate with suggestions and comments on our twitter and facebook pages. twitter.com/the_daner twitter.com/burntorangezack Hook 'em.
Dec 16, 2010
Dec 14, 2010
Dec 10, 2010
Dec 5, 2010
Nov 16, 2010
Nov 12, 2010
Nov 10, 2010
Nov 9, 2010
Rick Barnes 2010 = Mack Brown 2011
Nov 4, 2010
Nov 3, 2010
Burnt Orange Radio website
Nov 2, 2010
Oct 26, 2010
Rant from Iowa State weekend
2004 (with the big exception of 12-0 loss to OU), 2005 and 2008 were Greg Davis' halcyon days. The Texas offense in those years was the undisputed BEST in the country. Not easy to do. Why were these years so good when every other year under Davis has ranged from vaguely acceptable to mediocre to abysmal? Vince Young and Colt McCoy, two QBs who could always keep drives alive with their feet amid the consistent Davis mindfart. But guess what? After each bailout by his QBs, Davis invariably called plays aggressively in those years, and our offense was nigh invincible. The distinction between Vince and Colt is that Vince was the most dangerous presence in college football history, while Colt carried a near-equal clutch gene as Vince and had the two best receivers in Mack's tenure in '08 (notice how Colt's play dropped precipitously in '09 with the absence of Quan). The Vince and Colt offenses were drastically different schematically, but each relied on the ability of the heroic, athletic leader at QB to make things happen running. Unfortunately, Colt tricked Mack and GD into thinking they were good at running the finesse dink and dunk PASSING spread, something they should have had no illusions about after the Simms era. What they failed to realize (and this will never cease to amaze me) was that their meal ticket in two of our three most successful years was a RUNNING spread offense, that oh by the way just so happened to also be lethal in the pass because D's were so scared of Vince, Jamaal, Ramonce, Selvin. The success in '08 was a passing spread with zero running game (Ogbannaya was our featured RB, god bless him), but it only worked because of Colt's guts and Ship/Quan's brilliance.
Now any high school student with any understanding of analysis would look at the three most successful sample groups and say: OK, it looks like the KEY is having an uber-athlete at QB and designing an offense around a run-dominated zone-read/spread. Not only does that give Texas the running identity their coach craves, but it also allows average-at-best receivers (Pittman, Sweed, Brian Carter, freshman Quan) to post gaudy statistics because they're consistently wide open. All you need is for the uber-athlete to be basically adept at throwing the football to wide open dudes wearing the same color jersey. In conclusion, while the '08 sample was impressive, it has to be an anomaly. Great QB with two great WRs was enough to produce prolific offense, but to be swayed into thinking Texas can run the football without the presence of an uber-athlete or that Texas can methodically and consistently march down the field throwing short and sideways would be the height of hubris.
That Mack and especially Davis haven't EVER truthfully acknowledged what made them successful and fought day and night in recruiting to stockpile potential Vince Young, Cam Newton, et. al. prospects will go down as the biggest mistake of the Mack/Davis era. Yes, even bigger than not pulling Simms from the Colorado game until he hurt his hand when he was willfully flicking lit matches all over a kerosene-doused Texas dream. What makes it even MORE frustrating for fans is that Greg Davis is SORT OF A GURU at calling that type of an offense!!!! Chip Kelly modeled (and refined, improved upon) his Oregon offense on what Texas did in 2005! Gene Chizik, our D coordinator in '05 watched Vince Young work his magic that year. Think that had something to do with their aggressive acquisition of Cam Newton? Think he's gonna allow Auburn to recruit anything BUT 6'4 220+ black athletes to play QB there as long as he's in charge? I think not.
WTF were Mack and Davis ever thinking going away from that type of player?"
Oct 19, 2010
Oct 17, 2010
Texas Owns Nebraska
Oct 8, 2010
Bye-Week Bonanza
Oct 5, 2010
Sep 30, 2010
Sep 27, 2010
Sep 25, 2010
Gameday
Sep 24, 2010
Sep 22, 2010
UCLA '97
I personally couldn't watch anymore after 31-0 and was so annoyed at my friend's awkward, faux-respectful silence through it all that I insisted we leave and go drink in the endzone club with my uncle (being able to drink uninhibited at 17 was infinitely cooler than watching Texas get boatraced in stifling heat). I went back to the seats very late in the 4th and will never forget the site of our 80% empty stadium. My diehard father never abandoned his post and greeted me with the type of serious gaze that can only be interpreted as a warning not to engage. When it all ended, I berated my friend for the umpteenth time for giggling at the astonishing score and followed my father down the empty bleachers, expecting to enter the tunnel and exit the crime scene. However, Dad took a strange route along the railing at field level around the south endzone to the area where Texas was slowly trudging off the field, and I suddenly understood by his steely resolve that Dad was not going to leave without saying his piece. With Mackovic in sight and about 30 yards away Dad screamed: "Mackovic!" John heard him and looked. "PLEASE QUIT!!!!!!" And Johnny Mack actually held my father's gaze for about two seconds, almost as if he was struck by the realization that this season was going to be horrific, and undoubtedly his last.
So yes, I am just a little excited for this game Saturday. I want to win by five touchdowns but I'll take a more realistic 27-6 beating.
Sep 21, 2010
Does DJ Monroe Enhance our Offensive Identity?
Burnt Orange Radio Ep. 6
Sep 19, 2010
Tech postgame podcast
Sep 17, 2010
We are the trendy "Upset Special"
Sep 15, 2010
Should Vince Young receive the 2005 Heisman Trophy?
What was only an issue to UT fans five years ago has today become a national debate, only for a different reason (Reggie's forfeiture of the trophy due to being declared ineligible by the NCAA): should Vince Young be awarded the 2005 Heisman trophy? To
That Vince was indeed the best player of 2005 (and, many would argue, ever) and should have been the rightful recipient of the award originally has, unfortunately, not been stated enough (or at all) since the Reggie story has surfaced in the past week. That changed last night though, when on the late evening SportsCenter Herbstreit offered a slight modification to his prior stance that the award should be left vacated in light of a Bush confiscation/forfeiture. He now says that he "would have no issue" with the Heisman Trust giving the trophy to Young, because "we all saw what happened on the field" when Vince and Reggie played against one another, and beyond that because many believed that Young's regular season was every bit as dominant (if not more) than Bush's that year. So now we have a preeminent influence in college football media essentially endorsing the award being given to Vince, and though this is a transparent effort by Herbstreit to atone for his hysterical hype in 2005, the effort is commendable and welcome here at Burnt Orange Radio. The Herbstreit endorsement alone is why sports talk radio and television is making the debate a central theme of their programming today. I believe had Herbstreit not offered his (admittedly passive) opinion that the story would have less legs today than it otherwise would have.
But there are many who disagree. Jim Rome, Scott van Pelt, and Stewart Mandel have all categorically stated that Vince should not receive the Heisman. Mandel particularly is an influential print voice who I personally trust a great deal and seldom find myself at odds with. On the other hand, talking heads Skip Bayless and Trevor Matich have both signed off on the idea of retroactively crowning Vince the Heisman winner. There are sure to be many more public opinions forthcoming and I would love it if some of our readers could enlighten us as to what they read and hear in the comments section below.
While I am somewhere between tentative and sturdy in my conviction that Vince (and, just as importantly, the University of Texas) should get the Heisman, I am steadfast in my quarrel with the dissenters, whose primary justification for keeping the award vacant concerns the “rewriting of history.” The claim that a Vince Heisman would create a slippery slope whereby
We would really like to get interactive on this one, so please let us know what you think in the comments section below. Zack and I are doing a lengthy segment on this during tomorrow's broadcast and want to read your comments on the air. So help us improve our show by chiming in on this. Needless to say, this story is large nationally, but huge here in
Let us know what you think.
Burnt Orange Radio Ep. 3
Episode 3!!! Bigger, better, badder!!! Hook Em'!!
follow @the_daner and @burntorangezack on twitter and "LIKE" Burnt Orange Radio on Facebook. Also email in questions, comments, ideas, or concerns to burntorangeradio@hotmail.com and we will air them out on the show. Thanks for the support folks we have had over 40 hits on each of the first two shows. Enjoy and Go Longhorns!!!
Zack
Burnt Orange Radio
Episode 3
Sep 10, 2010
Burnt Orange Radio Ep. 2
Garrett Gilbert Is Cool Under Pressure.
Sep 8, 2010
Positives Outweigh Negatives
Texas v. Wyoming
Sep 7, 2010
Sep 4, 2010
Gameday

